Monday, March 16, 2020

My Notes of "Introduction to the Old Testament" by Amy-Jill Levine -- Part 3


2.6 The Novella

The later books of the canon move to the “novella,” i.e., short stories like Ruth and Jonah which explore in an extremely entertaining way how Israel is to relate to its neighbours. Ruth, the hero of her book, is a Moabite, one of the traditional enemies of Israel. And yet Ruth becomes the great grandmother of the famous King David. Jonah, who is probably the only prophet whose audience actually listened to him, is commissioned to go and speak to the people of Nineveh, the capital city of Assyria, Israel’s major enemy. Jonah doesn’t want to go. He doesn’t want the Assyrians to listen to him. Yet he goes and the Assyrians listen to him and God relents!

We also find court tales; stories of Jews, queens, and courtiers, who find themselves in royal courts outside of Israel in the Diaspora, (which simply means “the dispersion”), like the book of Esther. She was the great Jewish queen who managed to save her people from certain genocide. Then there’s the story of Daniel, who finds himself in both Babylonian and Persian courts where he has to fight to retain his identity while pressures were placed on him to assimilate to a Gentile culture, to eat food which is not permitted according to his religious laws, to pray in a manner that is not permitted according to his religious ideals. So, what these court tales do is to provide instructions to Jews on how to live in the Diaspora and how to live when Greek cultures put pressure on them to conform. How do you retain your identity? What do you give into? What makes you, you? These are problems people have in covenant communities today. For Jews and Christians who want to obey the law, how much do we give into secular society, and how much do we attempt to retain our independent and unique identity? The problems that the Bible raises are problems that will always continue.

2.7 Apocalyptic Visions

Finally, there are the apocalyptic visions. The latter part of the book of Daniel asks questions like, “When does righteousness ever show up?  Who is the messiah and when can we tell that he’s arrived? What happens at the end of time? Is there a resurrection of the dead? Does God make everything good again? And if so, how and when?”

And throughout the Hebrew Bible, the Tanakh, we encounter story tellers and lawmakers and bureaucrats and priests and prophets and scribes and visionaries and they all wrote for different audiences at different times using different literary genres. They don’t always agree with each other and we may not agree with them either. That’s part of the glory of this text.

Sunday, March 15, 2020

My Notes from "Introduction to the Old Testament" by Amy-Jill Levine -- Part 2


2.2 Narrative

The Genesis text moves from etiological myths related to primeval history into stories of some of the cultural heroes we know and love–such as Abraham and his descendants through to Joseph. Then, in Exodus we learn about Moses. Joshua and the Judges follow and then the early kings–Saul, David and Solomon. But, in these, we run into some legitimate historical challenges. When we get up to more historically depicted figures like Abraham or Joshua or Moses or Samson, we have to ask the tough historical questions: Are these real people? Do the biblical texts record what actually happened? E.g., Did the walls really fall down, when Joshua blew the trumpets at Jericho? Did Moses really stand up on a mountain and get a law of some sort? Were there really Israelites who were enslaved in Egypt and who miraculously escaped in the hundreds of thousands?

We have to approach our historical inquiry with a lot of openness, curiosity and integrity because the vast majority of these stories are not corroborated by ancient or Near Eastern literary or archeological discoveries. Now we know that the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence. But, on the other hand, no supporting evidence, means just that. So, if we are going to state categorically that these people were real and what is said about them and what they are reported to have done is historically accurate, then we have to acknowledge we do so, often based entirely and only on what the biblical texts state. So, a few more questions arise and are worthy of our consideration: Do we know who is telling these stories? And to what effect? Are they real stories? Are they legends? Are they a combination of fact and fiction? And why do ancient Israelites tell these particular stories.  I mean, think about some of these characters. Many of them are hardly inspiring or even morally ethical. Samson is frankly “stupid.” Why would they tell a story about hero who is plain dumb? Abraham is a trickster, as are several of his descendants. Jacob, with the help of his mother, is a liar and a cheat. Abraham does things like pass his wife off as his sister and places her in harems of foreign kings and seems to show concern only for himself.  But he’s “the father” of this people, the father of the Hebrews. And what about characters like Jephthah from the book of Judges who apparently offers his daughter as burnt offering to the LORD.[1] Why tell these stories about these characters?


2.3 Law 

Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy, along with the book of Genesis, comprise the Pentateuch. “Pentateuch” is a Greek word meaning “five scrolls,” and is often referred to as the book of Moses. The Pentateuch is full of legal material. There are many other laws than just the 10 commandments, which are fairly familiar to most people. But beyond questions like “honour your father and mother” and “don’t commit adultery” and “don’t murder,” the Bible has other law codes: dietary regulations, laws about how to plant your crops, torte law, laws about how to run the temple cult. Why are they there? What effect did they have? And how do those laws in general show how Israel considered itself to be a community in covenant? Israel had a “covenant” with God, and a “covenant” is simply legal contract. How were these laws the terms of that contract?


2.4 Prophetic Literature

Next, there is the prophetic literature. Most people today when they think about prophets, think about people who predict the future. But the biblical prophets, in general, were not predictors of the far-off future. In actuality, there were more like astute political and social critics, who told the people, “If you continue to behave in the way you are behaving, bad things will happen.” The prophets were interested in social justice. But they were also interested in political policy. They advised kings when to make foreign alliances, and when to remain isolationists. They were interested in the temple cult, how to run that cult, how to offer sacrifices, how personal repentance related to behaviour. For example, “Is it sufficient to simply offer up a bull as a sacrifice without being in a right relationship with your neighbour?” The prophets were much more than predictors of the future, more than social critics, more than political analysts. They were fantastic poets. They used arresting images and exquisite phrasing in order to get their message across. Because if one is a prophet, you cannot just say, “Behave yourselves,” because nobody is going to listen. So, you have to do it in a way that is going to gain the attention of the people who are supposed to be listening. And you have to do it in such a way the people will remember what you said and write down what you said. Part of the extraordinary aspect of ancient Israel is that they wrote down material that heavily and consistently criticized what they did. Israel was a community that was very interested in making itself better by recognizing what it did that was wrong to begin with.


2.5 Wisdom Literature

Whereas the prophets talk about how to conduct business, say in the temple cult or in politics, we also have a genre known as “wisdom literature,” which explains how to conduct business in the market place or among the upper classes. This is literature, like Proverbs, which tells you how to behave, but it is also literature that raises those profound questions that philosophers and theologians have yet to resolve. We have, for example the book of Job, which asks, in effect, “If God is a righteous God, why is Job suffering? Why do the wicked prosper? Why do the good endure pain and death and exile?” And whether Job actually resolves that problem or not is something scholars continue to debate. I think, in fact, Job provides an answer, but it may not be the answer most people want to hear.



[1] “And Jephthah made a vow to the Lord, and said, ‘If you will give the Ammonites into my hand, then whoever comes out of the doors of my house to meet me, when I return victorious from the Ammonites, shall be the Lord’s, to be offered up by me as a burnt offering’” (Judges 11:30). It was his daughter who first to come out and meet him after his victory. 

Saturday, March 14, 2020

My Notes from "Introduction to the Old Testament" by Amy-Jill Levine -- Part 1

Old Testament Conversations Series

Introduction to Old Testament[1]

The goal of biblical studies should not be to undermine religious faith. Rather, it should provide members of faith communities with richer insights into the literature that forms their foundation. Even if one insists that the biblical texts are divinely inspired or dictated by God, one should, I think, want to know as much as possible about the particulars: Why these words? Why in this order? Why are they set in specific social contexts? Do our present translations help or hinder our understanding? The OT is a difficult subject area for a variety of reasons, that we will demonstrate and discuss as we move forward. But where and how do we start?

Before we engage with any of the biblical texts, we need to start with a general description of the contents of these texts, the centuries they covers, the genres that are represented and some of the methods that biblical scholars, in both church and synagogue, on the one hand, and the academy and secular institutions, on the other hand bring to bear on this material. Our goal is to try to figure out both what it meant in its original context and what it means according to contemporary forms of interpretation. Once this basic information makes some sense, we can start where the Bible starts; in the beginning.

1. Contents 

The biblical texts span the creation of the world in Genesis 1 up to what happens to the Jewish community in the wake of Alexander the Great. That involves a staggering amount of content. Now, although dating the creation of the world is something that occupies evolutionists and creationists, people interested in what to put in public school textbooks, it is not something the Bible itself is concerned about. The initial chapters of Genesis are not concerned with history per se; they are not setting out there to say, “This is how evolution occurred,” or “This is a particular date upon which this happened.” Rather, the earliest materials are a myth[2].

In terms of the dating, when were these texts first written down? Some of these texts may stem orally from the early bronze age or the middle bronze age; sometime between 2000 to 1800 BCE. In terms of actual written texts, perhaps the first transcriptions, when that early oral material was transcribed into writing, perhaps around the iron age, year 1000 BCE, maybe 900 or so. Some biblical scholars will put this transcription at the court of King David, about the year 900. I think a few isolated texts (Numbers 15, Judges 5, etc.) were probably written down at that time, but most of OT texts probably date no earlier than the eighth century BCE, around 750 or so.

2. Genre

2.1 Cosmological Myths

Among the genres[3] we will encounter, we begin with [4]cosmological myths, which is just a fancy way of saying myths of origin. How did the world get started? Why are we here? Who is the God who created the world? And what are we supposed to be doing with our lives? The material in Genesis 1–11 in what is call the “primeval history.” Most people are familiar in general with the contents which includes: the stories about Adam and Eve, Cain and Abel, Noah’s ark and the universal flood, the tower of Babel. These are etiological myths[5]. These ancient stories help us understand what ancient Israel thought of itself, but they also provides remarkable cross-cultural comparisons. The stories in the history of Israel were not written in a vacuum. They were written in dialogue, and sometimes in competition with, other literatures in the ancient Near East––Babylonian stories, Assyrian stories, Egyptian stories, Canaanite stories and, later on in the OT, Greek stories.


[1] My notes adapted from Prof. Levine’s Audio “The Great Courses” Lecture: The Old Testament. Amy-Jill Levine, The Old Testament. Narrated by Amy-Jill Levine. Newark: Audible, 2013.
[2] Myth: from the Greek word “mythos” which means, “a traditional story, especially one concerning the early history of a people or explaining some natural or social phenomenon, and typically involving supernatural beings or events.” IT DOES NOT MEAN, “false or untrue” although for many it is come to mean that in usage. This is unfortunate. Myths are stories! Jesus told stories to make truth clear. So do the myths of the OT.
[3] Genre: “a category of artistic, musical, or literary composition characterized by a particular style, form, or content.” Examples of biblical genres include: myth, historical narrative, poetry, wisdom, prophecy, apocalypse, law, etc.
[4] Cosmological: “Or, or pertaining to, the origin and general structure of the universe, with its parts, elements, and laws, and especially such of its characteristics as space, time, causality, and freedom.
[5] Etiological myths are those stories used by cultures to explain origins and causes. For example, creation stories are etiological, explaining how the universe or the world or life in the world came into being.

Wednesday, March 11, 2020

"The Heresy of Explanation"

Pastors, preachers and Bible teachers, we need to stop "dumbing down" the biblical texts, because we believe modern audiences are incapable of wrestling with the texts and thus need our "expert explanations." I think such a practice is demeaning to both the biblical texts and to our audiences. When we do this, we are not even feeding our congregations on "milk" (let alone "solid food") but rather we are feeding them pre-digested, pre-packaged bits of our own making. A major part of the mystery, the challenge, and even the power of the biblical texts is found, not in their clarity but in their ambiguity, not in their harmony but in their diversity, not in their unity but in their plurality.
When I was much younger (by about 55 years), I didn't like steak. I wanted hamburger. Why? Because eating steak was too much effort. You had to cut it with a knife and chew it longer and I just wanted to get the meal over quickly and get on with my life of play. So much preaching and teaching today, if it has anything really to do with the biblical texts, is not even hamburger but rather is beef juice or a little beef tablet. People want and need substance. We continue to infantilize the church members (and their guests) by not allowing them to wrestle, struggle and persevere through the challenges of the biblical texts, and thus come to their own place of faith. As Robert Alter says (in the following quote), "...in the most egregious instances this amounts to explaining away the Bible." IMO, we need to pose questions, identify the texts' ambiguities, variations and pluralities, and simply provide some basic tools by which our fellow Christians can, both individually and collectively, wrestle and thus grow.
"The unacknowledged heresy underlying most modern English versions of the Bible is the use of translation as a vehicle for explaining the Bible instead of representing it in another language, and in the most egregious instances this amounts to explaining away the Bible. This impulse may be attributed...to a feeling that the Bible, because of its canonical status, has to be made accessible—indeed, transparent—to all...Modern translators, in their zeal to uncover the meanings of the biblical text for the instruction of a modern readership, frequently lose sight of how the text intimates its meanings—the distinctive, artfully deployed features of ancient Hebrew prose and poetry that are the instruments for the articulation of all meaning, message, insight, and vision...A suitable English version should avoid at all costs the modern abomination of elegant synonymous variation, for the literary prose of the Bible turns everywhere on significant repetition, not variation...Finally, the mesmerizing effect of these ancient stories will scarcely be conveyed if they are not rendered in cadenced English prose that at least in some ways corresponds to the powerful cadences of the Hebrew."
Alter, Robert. The Five Books of Moses: A Translation with Commentary. W. W. Norton & Company. Kindle Edition.

Sunday, March 8, 2020

Some Call It "Fear," But I Call It "Love."

Some call it "fear," but I call it "love." As one who lives with a weakened immune system, I want to say "thank you" to those who have symptoms of any viral infection (cough, nasal drainage, fever, malaise, etc.) who stay home rather than going to work, school, work, church or any other gatherings. Even though you probably don't have COVID-19, it is flu season and flu can (and does) kill those who are in any way immunocompromised.

For my Christian friends, "fear not" does not mean "love not." Love takes precedence and "love always protects (1 Cor 13:4–7). Jesus teaches his followers, “In everything do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets" (Matt 7:12). What if you were the person who is well, but has underlying and chronic health conditions? What would you want those who are symptomatic of any viral infection to do? Would you want them to demonstrate their faith by attending church, going to work or attending classes?

Perhaps you think that those Christians who choose to avoid gatherings right have a weak faith. If so, I urge you to read Romans 14:1–15:6. Perhaps, rather, these so-called "weak" Christians don't have confidence that some of their fellow Christians will think about others first (See also Phil 2:1–3).
  • Welcome those who are weak in faith, but not for the purpose of quarrelling over opinions. (14:1)
  • Why do you pass judgment on your brother or sister? Or you, why do you despise your brother or sister? (14:10)
  • We who are strong ought to put up with the failings of the weak, and not to please ourselves. (15:1)
Whether you live with a weakened immune system, or are healthy but have symptoms of a viral infection, don't let yourself be spiritually bullied by those who call your faithfulness into question because you choose to follow the advice of medical experts who are working tirelessly to halt the spread of infection. Protect others and yourself. Stay home and get well. Reach out to others via phone, text, messaging, FaceTime, etc. God will not save us from arrogance and selfishness.

Introducing My "Skeptics Believe" Website

Greetings: If you are one of the readers/subscribers to this blog, you've noted I've not published any posts here since early March....